Central enterprises should become assistants in real estate regulation
- Browse: 11
- Source: Dongyang Information Network
Summary: The real estate industry is related to the people's livelihood, and central enterprises also assume the responsibility of benefiting the people in the public sector. With the new round of deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises, the development positioning of state-owned and state-owned enterprises has become clearer. The main line should be "share with the people". The path is to gradually concede and withdraw from the general competitive field, including the real estate field. At the same time, it is necessary to shoulder more social responsibilities and public service missions, actively respond to, implement, and implement the central government's decision-making and deployment, and it will also be a constraint to become an assistant.
Recently, "China Economic Weekly" took stock of the performance of the "national team" of housing enterprises in the property market in 2016: Among the top 15 real estate companies with land expenditure, the "national team" composed of central and state-owned enterprises It is located at 8 seats. Of the 16 Big Mac projects with a total land value of more than 10 billion, 9 of them have the "national prefix". It is impossible that the enthusiasm of the central enterprises to get involved in real estate has continued unabated, and the story of the invention of the invention has one concept after another and the concept of "land king", nor has it been questioned and accused by the outside world as a driving force for the surge in house prices .
In the raging Chinese real estate market, what role should real estate central enterprises play? The debate has been ongoing for so long. Many people believe that state-owned enterprises are also enterprises. From the perspective of the main body of the market economy, the behavior of state-owned enterprises in pursuing the real estate market is reasonable. However, some people still think that central SOEs are not market economic entities, and they also bear no political and social responsibilities. Their business behavior must be based solely on the laws of the market and should be subject to administrative control by the competent government department.
However, from the perspective of the actual performance of central SOEs, it is more a matter of practice before their own point of view. Whichever industry has a high profit margin will flow to it. With the full use of capital advantages, it will overcome challenges in the highly competitive real estate industry, even if it creates more "land kings" There is no restraint. This is obviously inconsistent with the functional positioning of central enterprises, and to some extent runs counter to the state's real estate control policy.
Regarding the state-owned enterprises engaging in real estate business , relevant state departments have already issued relevant regulations, from which they cannot understand the proper positioning of the state-owned enterprises. Imagine that during the "two sessions" of the country in 2010, there was a "land king" in the story of a story invented by central enterprises in one day, which caused public outcry. And on March 18th, the SASAC made a public opinion and resolutely issued a "check-out order", requiring 78 central SOEs that do not rely on real estate to clear their real estate business, leaving only 16 central SOEs whose main business is real estate. . Obviously, this is pouring cold water on the participation of central enterprises in the property market. It also proves that central enterprises are not the main players in the market economy, and have to shoulder the heavy responsibility of cooperating with the state's regulatory policies. From July 2nd to August 500th, 2015, the first inspection team of the Central Government conducted a special inspection of China Aviation Industry Corporation, and pointed out the big problem of "a number of units have turned a blind eye to the central government's real estate regulation and control policy, and the project development has not stopped" , Regarded as the most severe and direct shot. This is also tantamount to issuing a statement that state-owned enterprises should become assistants in real estate regulation and control, but also an irrational rise in house prices.
The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission's "check-out order" has been in place for almost seven years, but state-owned enterprises have become more and more stagnant in the property market. Instead, they seem to be more active. One of the central enterprises allowed to get involved in the real estate business could not quietly increase from 16 to 21; of the 78 central enterprises that were required to "check out", as of the end of 2012, there were only 20 lack of compliance exits; and three of them were in-depth Involved in the real estate industry, directly or indirectly became the maker of some "land kings". Judging from the surface cells, it is impossible for the "check-out order" to have more and more timetables and specific implementation plans, as well as the legally binding problem of the government order itself, which has led to the slow pace of central enterprises' withdrawal from the property market. However, from the perspective of the depth, it is impossible that the real estate business cannot become an important source of profit for many central enterprises. Once the "check-out order" is fully and strictly implemented, performance will be greatly affected, and profits will decline significantly. Central enterprises do not want me, nor do regulatory agencies force the non-main real estate central enterprises to withdraw from the real estate business. This again proves that "touching the interests is harder than touching the soul."
The real estate industry is related to the people's livelihood. Central enterprises also assume the responsibility of benefiting the people in the public sector. With the new round of deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises, the development positioning of state-owned and state-owned enterprises has become clearer. The main line should be "share with the people". The path is to gradually concede and withdraw from the general competitive field, including the real estate field. At the same time, it is necessary to shoulder more social responsibilities and public service missions, actively respond to, implement, and implement the central government's decision-making and deployment, and it will also be a constraint to become an assistant.
- Prospects for healthy housing in real estate supply-side reform
- Moody's: China's real estate sales growth rate will slow in 2017
- Real estate workplace elimination this year is crueler than any other year
- Chongqing cleans up 627 "zombie" real estate companies in 2016
- Both house prices and mortgages have fallen, and real estate is out of business and on track